Shaft & Structure Load Check
Whether the torque you are putting through a shaft will twist it. One V5 motor on a red cartridge out-torques a standard VEX shaft with no gearing at all.
Inputs
Gearing between the motor and this shaft.
Impacts load a shaft far above its steady torque. 1 is a smooth mechanism, 2 covers ordinary knocks, 3 or more for a drive that gets rammed.
Results
Will it survive?
—
Torque on the shaft
—N·m
Motor stall, times gearing.
With shock allowance
—N·m
Shaft yields at
—N·m
Shaft shears at
—N·m
Safety factor
—
Yield torque ÷ applied, shock included.
If it fails
—
Yield is where the shaft takes a permanent twist, not where it snaps. A shaft that has yielded stays bent and never comes back.
How this is calculated
Twisted shafts are one of the most common VEX failures, and they are almost always predictable. A shaft carries whatever the motors can produce multiplied by whatever gearing sits between, and gearing for torque is exactly what makes shafts fail.
torque on shaft = motors × stall torque × gear ratioNote it uses stall torque. The shaft does not care about your usual operating point; it cares about the worst moment, which is when the mechanism jams and every motor pushes as hard as it can.
The number worth remembering
A standard 1/8" shaft takes a permanent twist at roughly1.24 N·m. A single V5 motor on a 100 RPM cartridge stalls at 2.1 N·m. One motor, geared 1:1, already exceeds a standard shaft.
Gear that motor down 5:1 for a lift and the shaft sees over 10 N·m, which is eight times what it can take and beyond even a high strength shaft. This is why lift shafts twist, and why the fix is a bigger shaft or splitting the load across two, not a stronger motor.
Why the square shape matters
shear stress = 4.81 × torque ÷ side³With your numbers
Strength scales with the cube of the side length. Going from 1/8" to 1/4" doubles the side and therefore multiplies capacity by eight, which is why the high strength shaft is not a marginal upgrade but a completely different part.
It also means the square corners carry the stress. A shaft that has been rounded off by a loose gear is meaningfully weaker than a fresh one, and the analysis assumes sharp corners.
Shock is not optional
A drivetrain being rammed, or a lift dropped onto its stop, applies far more than its steady torque for a moment. Designing exactly to the stall figure means designing to fail the first time something hits you, which is what the shock factor is for.
What this does not cover
Only torsion in one shaft. Bending from a cantilevered wheel, bearing loads, gear tooth strength and screw shear are all real and none are here. A shaft can also fail in bending while passing this check comfortably.
Sources & assumptions
Stall torque is published for the 100 RPM cartridge andderived for the others by scaling inversely with speed. Gear tooth counts and shaft sizes are VEX published.
Shaft strengths are derived. VEX publishes no strength figures for its shafts. These are calculated from square-shaft torsion theory assuming 54 ksi yield and 64 ksi ultimate tensile strength, which is a common assumption for the steel used but is not confirmed by VEX. Treat them as a guide to which shaft to reach for, not as a certified rating.
Assumes a single shaft in pure torsion with sharp corners, at stall, carrying the full motor output. A shaft shared through a differential or supported at both ends by driven gears sees less than this.
- Purdue SIGBots Wiki — VEX Motors — checked 2026-08-17
- VEX Robotics — V5 Smart Motor & Gear Cartridges (276-4840) — checked 2026-08-17
- VEX Robotics — C-Channels (8 sizes) — checked 2026-08-17
Save this run, and compare
Keeps what is on screen so you can change something and see both sides of the change. Saved in this browser only, never uploaded.
Save this as evidence
Collects what you entered, what came out, how it was worked out, and anything the tool flagged, with a timestamp and a version so someone else can reproduce it.
This is evidence, not a notebook entry. It deliberately does not write your problem statement, your reasoning, or your conclusion, because under RECF rules an Engineering Notebook has to be the students' own work and no tool may generate or organise its content. Take the numbers, decide what matters, and write it yourself.